翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Degenerative suspensory ligament desmitis ・ Defunct AF2 teams ・ Defunct local councils of the Boy Scouts of America ・ Defunct New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association conferences ・ Defunct North American collegiate sororities ・ Defunct Ohio high school athletic conferences ・ Defunct placenames of New Hampshire ・ Defunct schools in Sandwell ・ Defunct schools in the Metropolitan Borough of Dudley ・ Defunct Scout and Scout-like organizations in the United States ・ Defunct townships of Cuyahoga County, Ohio ・ Defunctionalization ・ DeFuniak Springs Airport ・ DeFuniak Springs Historic District ・ DeFuniak Springs, Florida ・ DeFunis v. Odegaard ・ Defunkt ・ Defuser (comics) ・ Defuzzification ・ Defy ・ Defy Appliances ・ Defy Everything ・ Defy Media ・ Defy Thirst ・ Defy Ventures ・ Defy You ・ Defying Gravity ・ Defying Gravity (1997 film) ・ Defying Gravity (2008 film) ・ Defying Gravity (Keith Urban album) Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク DeFunis v. Odegaard ： ウィキペディア英語版 DeFunis v. Odegaard ''DeFunis v. Odegaard'', 416 U.S. 312 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case decided on April 23, 1974, that was determined to be moot, and therefore could not go forward. American student Marco DeFunis, who had been denied admission to the University of Washington School of Law in the state of Washington, and then had been provisionally admitted during the pendency of the case, was slated to graduate within a few months at the time the decision was rendered.〔Karabel, Jerome. ''The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton.'' Boston: Mifflin, 2005.〕 The Court rejected the assertion that the case fell into either of two exceptions to the mootness doctrine that were raised by the plaintiff. The case did not constitute "voluntary cessation" on the part of the defendant law school, because the plaintiff was now in his final quarter, and the law school could take no action to deny him the ability to graduate. Nor was this a question that was "capable of repetition, yet evading review" because the plaintiff would never again face this situation, and others who might raise the same complaint in the future might be able to receive full review in the courts. DeFunis argued that materials brought to light during discovery and entered into evidence in the trial court showed that his initial denial of admission to the law school was the result of the operation of the law school's affirmative action policy favoring the admission of minority applicants over better-qualified white candidates. Although the Court refused to consider the case on the merits in ''DeFunis'', the issue of affirmative action returned to the Court, ''sans'' any problem of mootness, and achieved an opinion on the merits in ''Regents of the University of California v. Bakke''. ==See also== * List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 416 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「DeFunis v. Odegaard」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.